Thailand Rejects Casino Legalization Under New PM

Thailand’s new Prime Minister, Anutin Charnvirakul, has firmly rejected casino legalization during his tenure, halting progress on the Entertainment Complex Bill. This decision, announced on September 11, 2025, reverses prior momentum toward regulated gaming in the kingdom, impacting potential new casino market entrants. The move underscores Thailand’s cautious stance on gambling amid concerns over tourism and diplomatic relations with China.

Key Takeaways

• Thailand’s casino legalization efforts stall, delaying new market opportunities.
• Regulatory uncertainty affects operators eyeing Southeast Asian expansion.
• The decision prioritizes tourism and diplomatic ties over gaming revenue.

The Entertainment Complex Bill, which proposed integrated resorts with regulated casinos, has been shelved under Charnvirakul’s leadership. The bill, previously supported by former Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin, aimed to establish Thailand as a gaming hub in Southeast Asia, potentially rivaling Macau and Singapore. Charnvirakul cited negative impacts on Thailand’s tourism brand and strained relations with China, which opposes gambling, as key reasons for the rejection. The decision aligns with Thailand’s strict anti-gambling laws under the Gambling Act of 1935, which permits only limited forms of betting, such as horse racing and the national lottery.

This development significantly affects operators like MGM Resorts, which has been exploring opportunities in Thailand’s projected $8 billion gaming market. The absence of a clear regulatory framework delays market entry for global brands seeking to capitalize on Thailand’s 40 million annual tourists and growing middle class. The Thai Casino Study Group, formed in 2024, had outlined a licensing model requiring operators to invest in non-gaming amenities, adhere to strict anti-money laundering protocols, and partner with local entities. However, without political support, these plans remain dormant.

For players, the decision limits access to regulated gaming options, pushing activity toward unregulated offshore platforms. Industry stakeholders, including software providers and payment processors, face prolonged uncertainty in a high-potential market. Charnvirakul’s stance suggests operators must wait for a future administration to revisit legalization, potentially years away. This setback contrasts with neighboring Cambodia and the Philippines, where regulated casinos thrive, highlighting Thailand’s unique regulatory challenges.

Sources: iGamingBusiness